The Supplier Risk Assessment Process: A Step-by-Step Framework
Moving from “best practice” to “compliance mandate.”
Case Studies
Real-life examples of how organizations use PaymentWorks to improve compliance, reduce workload, and add value.Stuff to Watch
Library of short and sweet videos featuring product demos, customer interviews, and sessions with experts.
Podcasts
The perfect way to geek out on all things vendor management, and get tips from our guests, partners, and customers.
Vendor Management Appreciation Day
Dedicated to celebrating the unsung heroes of vendor management and up-leveling your strategy.
Events
We go places. We do things. Join us!Moving from “best practice” to “compliance mandate.”

“Supplier risk assessment process” sounds like the kind of phrase you read in a whitepaper while reaching for a third cup of coffee. That said, it shouldn’t be boring, because this process helps you catch fraud before it happens—and saves you from cleaning up an expensive mess afterward.
And as we stare down Nacha’s upcoming 2026 ACH rules (yes, 2026 is around the corner; stop pretending it’s not), this process just went from “best practice” to “compliance mandate.”
So buckle up. This isn’t just another compliance checklist. This guide walks you step by step through how to get your supplier risk assessment process right—from onboarding to monitoring and everything in between.
Why the Supplier Risk Assessment Process Matters (Now More Than Ever)
Step 1: Treat Onboarding as Your First Line of Defense
Step 2: Automate the Supplier Risk Assessment Process
Step 3: Move Beyond the One-and-Done Checklist
Step 4: Build a Documentation Trail That’s Audit-Proof
Step 5: Build a Supplier Risk Assessment Process That Scales Reliably
Step 6: Transform Compliance Into Competitive Advantage
Preparing Now for Nacha’s 2026 ACH Rule Changes
Supplier Risk Assessment Process: Continuous, Proactive, Secure, Audit-Ready
Get Ready for Vendor Management Day 2025
Want Help Aligning Teams On Supplier Risk Assessments?
Interested in More Tips On Supplier Risk Assessments?
Want Personalized Guidance On Supplier Risk Assessments?
People Also Ask – Supplier Risk Assessment FAQs
Here’s the headline: Nacha, the governing body for the ACH network, has announced rule changes that will kick in by 2026.
Their goal? To make sure everyone using ACH payments is actively working to prevent fraud.
In other words, if you’re paying vendors by ACH, Nacha is putting more responsibility on you to verify account info and keep your process secure.
To put these updates in perspective, here’s what’s coming down the pipeline:
At the same time, fraudsters have gotten a lot better at what they do. Business email compromise attacks cost organizations billions annually, and a frightening number of them start with a fake vendor profile or a sneaky bank account change request. Because of that increased sophistication, it’s more important than ever to tighten your onboarding controls.
That’s why this guide starts where the risk starts: supplier onboarding.
Most organizations think about risk after the first invoice is paid. By then, it’s too late.
To be clear, the supplier risk assessment process should kick in the moment a vendor raises their hand and says, “Pay me.”
In other words, at onboarding, you should be:
Nacha’s 2026 rules will impact this first step the most. The updated requirements will expect that you have processes in place for account validation before the first payment is sent.
To be extra clear, spreadsheets, manual phone calls, and “gut checks” no longer cut it.
Next, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: manual processes are slow, risky, and (if we’re being honest) soul-crushing. Just ask Hannah Kanouff, Vendor Management Coordinator for the Office of Central Procurement at Penn State University:
If your supplier risk assessment process involves emailing PDFs back and forth, manually keying in routing numbers, and double-checking against a Google search, you’re living in the compliance Stone Age.
This is where automation comes in. Platforms like PaymentWorks make onboarding smooth, secure, and documented — all in one flow.
Here’s how automation flips the script:
Think of it as turning a process that used to feel like chasing paperwork with a flashlight into a process that runs quietly in the background while you focus on strategic work.
Next, let’s move beyond the basics. Here’s where we get tough-love honest: your static “due diligence checklist” is giving you a false sense of security.
Sure, it feels good to check the boxes:
However, what happens six months later when that vendor’s bank account is compromised?
Or when their compliance standing changes?
A modern supplier risk assessment process must be dynamic. It includes ongoing monitoring — which means you get alerted when something material changes about your vendor.
This shift from static to continuous is exactly where Nacha is headed with its rule changes. They don’t just want to know that you once validated bank info. They want to know you have a system in place that can catch problems before the next payment goes out.
Equally important, documentation shouldn’t be an afterthought.
When auditors, regulators, or leadership ask, “How do we know we did our due diligence?” you want to be able to pull up a clear, complete record — not scramble through email threads hoping you can piece together a story.
Automated onboarding platforms make this easy by:
Nacha’s rules will make this not just a nice-to-have, but a requirement. And when something goes wrong — because let’s be honest, fraudsters don’t take vacations — you’ll have the documentation that shows you followed best practices.
As a healthy reminder, your vendor population isn’t shrinking. If anything, each month means more suppliers — across geographies, currencies, and business units. That means your exposure continues to grow, too.
As your vendor base grows, scalability becomes crucial.
It prevents your AP team from being buried under manual validations and follow-ups every time a new vendor comes on board.
Here’s what scalability looks like in practice:
Nacha’s 2026 rule changes intersect with business reality. In other words, the rules don’t expect that you manually re-verify 10,000 suppliers every quarter — they expect you to have a scalable, defensible process that consistently validates and monitors payment data before funds are released.
Scaling well keeps suppliers paid on time and strengthens your reputation as a reliable partner.
Finally, let’s flip the narrative. Let’s explore what’s really at stake. Too often, organizations treat supplier risk management as a “have to,” not a “get to.” The assumption is that it’s all cost center, no value-add.
In truth, a robust supplier risk assessment process actually improves business outcomes.
To emphasize, every dollar you save by preventing fraud is a dollar you can reinvest in innovation, talent, additional technology, or supplier partnerships. Compliance, done well, becomes a business advantage.
Nacha’s 2026 rule changes pose the most significant update to ACH fraud prevention requirements in years. The changes emphasize:
This goes beyond putting more burden on AP teams. Rather, it creates accountability and protects the entire payment ecosystem.
If you put the right technology in place now, 2026 won’t feel like a fire drill. Instead, you’ll already have:
The companies that wait until Q4 of 2025 to get ready will be racing against the clock. The companies that start today will be able to approach 2026 with confidence. Those organizations may even be able to use it as a moment to showcase their risk management maturity to the board.
The supplier risk assessment process is now a strategic function that strengthens supplier relationships and keeps you on the right side of regulators.
Put differently, it should be:
The Nacha 2026 rule changes present more than a simple compliance checkbox; they offer a nudge (or maybe a shove) toward the kind of process maturity that every organization should already be aiming for.
So yes, it takes work to build or modernize a supplier risk assessment process. But with automation, technology handles the heavy lifting rather than leaving it to overworked humans. Your team can stop chasing paper and start focusing on strategy.
At the end of the day, compliance isn’t just about avoiding penalties. It’s about trust — trust from your suppliers, your auditors, your leadership, and ultimately, your customers. And that’s the kind of outcome that’s worth every effort.
The annual Vendor Management Appreciation Day (VMAD) celebration will continue in 2025. Will you join us?
There’s no expiration date on honoring one of the most important, under-recognized roles across industries: vendor management.
Join us in observing Vendor Management Appreciation Day (VMAD)! We’re gearing up for the 2025 celebration, and we want you to be a part of it!

VMAD is a new holiday geared toward unifying vendor management professionals and celebrating innovation in the field.
Moreover, we’ve released gifts each month to help you supercharge your vendor management efforts. Additionally, we’re planning some awesome events so everyone can connect and celebrate the important, strategic role of vendor management.
In the meantime, learn more here, and grab some free vendor management goodies.
Explore our blogs below. They’re filled with action items you can implement right away.
Vendor Onboarding Software: How to Find the Best Platform
How Vendor Management Platforms Strengthen ACH Fraud Risk Management and Improve ROI
How Poor Supplier Data Management Undermines Strategic Decision-Making
Why a Weak Vendor Identification Process at Onboarding Makes You Vulnerable to Fraud
Contact Us–we’d love to help you
The supplier risk assessment process is the structured approach organizations use to identify, evaluate, and manage potential risks associated with their vendors. It typically begins during supplier onboarding and continues through the life of the relationship. A strong process helps protect payments, ensure regulatory compliance (including upcoming Nacha 2026 ACH rules), and safeguard operations from fraud, financial instability, or supply chain disruptions.
A supplier risk assessment process usually includes verifying supplier identity, validating banking details, screening against sanctions lists, reviewing compliance and financial health, and documenting approvals. Modern processes also include ongoing monitoring to catch changes over time. Automation platforms streamline these steps, making it easier to meet regulatory expectations like Nacha’s 2026 ACH account validation requirements while reducing manual errors and speeding up vendor onboarding.
Responsibility for the supplier risk assessment process typically spans multiple teams — including procurement, accounts payable, compliance, and risk management — but is often coordinated by finance or vendor management leaders. The goal is to centralize controls so that supplier data is verified, payments are secure, and documentation is audit-ready. Many organizations use platforms to automate tasks and maintain consistent oversight across departments.
The supplier risk assessment process should be reviewed and updated regularly — at least annually — to keep pace with evolving threats, regulatory changes, and business needs. With Nacha’s 2026 ACH rules increasing expectations for account validation and monitoring, continuous or event-driven updates are becoming best practice. Automated systems make it possible to refresh supplier data and flag risk changes in real time, reducing compliance gaps.
We’d love to walk through your process with you and talk about security, compliance, efficiency and sleeping better at night.
© Copyright 2025 - PaymentWorks